- Size Oriented Metrics In Software Engineering
- Data Structure Metrics In Software Engineering Ppt Free
![Introduction Introduction](/uploads/1/2/6/0/126089685/379797314.jpg)
Size Oriented Metrics In Software Engineering
Product quality metrics (1/2) Product metrics help software engineers to better understand the attributes of models and assess the quality of the software. They help software engineers to gain insight into the design and construction of the software. Software metrics have become an integral part of software development and are used during every phase of the software development life cycle. Research in the area of software metrics tends to focus predominantly on static metrics that are obtained by static analysis of the software artifact. What are information flow metrics in software engineering? Update Cancel. What are quality metrics in software engineering? What is data structure metrics in software engineering? What are some important software development metrics? What are the uses of software metrics? Design.ppt - Download as Powerpoint Presentation (.ppt), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. Scribd adalah situs bacaan dan penerbitan sosial terbesar di dunia.
Data Structure Metrics In Software Engineering Ppt Free
- Henderson-Sellers B. Software Metrics. Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstaed, UK, 1996.Google Scholar
- McCabe T. A complexity metric. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1976, 2(4): 308–320.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Fenton N, Neil M. Software metrics: Successes failures and new directions. Journal of Systems and Software, 1999, 47(2/3): 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chidamber S R, Kemerer C F. A metrics suite for objectoriented design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1994, 20(6): 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Abreu F B. The MOOD metrics set. In ECOOP’95 Workshop on Metrics, Åarhus, Dénmark, Aug. 7-11, 1995.Google Scholar
- Lorenz M, Kidd J. Object-Oriented Software Metrics: A Practical Guide. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1994.Google Scholar
- Briand L C, Devanbu W, Melo W. An investigation into coupling measures for C++. In Proc. the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 1997), Boston, USA, May 17-21, 1997, pp.412–421.Google Scholar
- Harrison R, Counsell S, Nithi R. Coupling metrics for objectoriented design. In Proc. the 5th International Software Metrics Symposium Metrics, Bethesda, USA, Mar. 20-21, 1998, pp.150–156.Google Scholar
- Bansiya J, Etzkorn L, Davis C, Li W. A class cohesion metric for object-oriented designs. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, 1999, 11(8): 47–52.Google Scholar
- Briand L C, Daly JW,Wust J K. A unified framework for coupling measurement in object-oriented systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1999, 25(1): 91–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee Y S, Liang B S. Measuring the coupling and cohesion of an object-oriented program based on information flow. In Proc. International Conference on Software Quality, Maribor, Slovenia, Oct. 17-20, 1995, pp.81–90.Google Scholar
- Allen E, Khoshgoftaar T. Measuring coupling and cohesion, an information-theory approach. In Proc. the IEEE International Symposium on Software Metrics, Boca Raton, USA, Nov. 4-6, 1999, pp.119–127.Google Scholar
- Eder J, Kappel G, Schrefl M. Coupling and cohesion in objectoriented systems. Tech. Rep. 2/93, Department of Information Systems, University of Linz, Austria, 1993.Google Scholar
- Li W, Henry S. Maintenance metrics for the object-oriented paradigm. In Proc. the First International Software Metrics Symposium, May 21-22, Baltimore, USA, 1993, pp.52–60.Google Scholar
- Hitz M, Montazeri B. Measuring coupling and cohesion in object-oriented systems. In Proc. International Symposium on Applied Corporate Computing, Monterrey, Mexico, Oct. 1995, pp.25–27.Google Scholar
- Alexander R T, Offutt J. Coupling-based testing of O-O programs. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 2004, 10(4): 391–427.Google Scholar
- Briand L C, Daly J W, Wüst J. A unified framework for cohesion measurement in object-oriented systems. Empirical Software Engineering, 1998, 3(1): 65–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ott L M, Bieman J M, Kang B K. Developing measures of class cohesion for object-oriented software. In Proc. the 7th Annual Oregon Workshop on Software Metrics, Oregon, USA, 1995.Google Scholar
- Ott L M, Bieman J M. Program slices as an abstraction for cohesion measurement. Journal of Information and Software Technology, 1998, 40(11/12): 691–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kang B K, Bieman J M. Design-level cohesion measures, derivation, comparison, and applications. In Proc. the 20th Computer Software and Applications Conference, Seoul, Korea, Aug. 21-23, 1996, pp.92–97.Google Scholar
- Chae H S, Kwon Y R. A cohesion measure for classes in object-oriented systems. In Proc. the 5th International Software Metrics Symposium, Bethesda, USA, 1998, pp.158–166.Google Scholar
- Chae H S, Kwon Y R, Bae D H. A cohesion measure for object-oriented classes. Software Practice and Experience, 2000, 30(12): 1405–1431.zbMATH3.0.CO%3B2-3'>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chae H S, Kwon Y R. Improving cohesion metrics for classes by considering dependent instance variables. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2004, 30(11): 826–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen Z, Zhou Y, Xu B, Zhao J, Yang H. A novel approach to measuring class cohesion based on dependence analysis. In Proc. International Conference on Software Maintenance, Montreal, Canada, Oct. 3-6, 2002, pp.377–384.Google Scholar
- Zhou Y L, Wen L, Wang J, Chen Y, Lu H, Xu B. DRC: A dependence relationships based cohesion measure for classes. In Proc. the Tenth Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC 2003), Chiang Mai, Thailand, Dec. 10-12, 2003, pp.215–233.Google Scholar
- Zhou Y, Lu J, Lu H, Xu B. A comparative study of graph theory-based class cohesion measures. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2004, 29(2): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Zhou Y, Wen L, Chen Y, Lu H, Xu B. DMC: A more precise cohesion measure for classes. Information and Software Technology, 2005, 47(3): 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell A, Power J F. An empirical investigation into the dimensions of run-time coupling in Java programs. In Proc. the 3rd Conference on the Principles and Practice of Programming in Java, Las Vegas, USA, Jun. 16-18, 2004, pp.9–14.Google Scholar
- Arisholm E. Dynamic coupling measures for object-oriented software. In Proc. the Eighth IEEE Symposium Software Metrics (METRICS 2002), Ottawa, Canada, Jun. 4-7, 2002, pp.33–42.Google Scholar
- Arisholm E. Empirical assessment of changeability in objectoriented software [Ph.D. Dissertation]. University of Oslo, 2001.Google Scholar
- Arisholm E, Briand L C, Foyen A. Dynamic coupling measures for object-oriented software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2004, 30(8): 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell A, Power J F. Using object-level run-time metrics to study coupling between objects. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Santa Fe, USA, Mar. 13-17, 2005, pp.1456–1462.Google Scholar
- Mitchell A, Power J F. A study of the influence of coverage on the relationship between static and dynamic coupling metrics. Science of Computer Programming, 2006, 59(1/2): 4–25.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Yacoub S, Ammar H, Robinson T. Dynamic metrics for object-oriented designs. In Proc. the 5th International Software Metrics Symposium, Boca Raton, USA, Nov. 4-6, 1999, pp.50–61.Google Scholar
- Hassoun Y, Johnson R, Counsell S. A dynamic runtime coupling metric for meta-level architectures. In Proc. Eur-pean Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2004), Tempere, Finland, Mar. 24-26, 2004, pp.339–346.Google Scholar
- Hassoun Y, Johnson R, Counsell S. Empirical validation of a dynamic coupling metric. Technical Report, BBKCS-04-03, School of Computer Science and Information Systems, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK, March, 2004.Google Scholar
- Hassoun Y, Counsell S, Johnson R. Dynamic coupling metricproof of concept. IEE Proc. Software, 2005, 152(6): 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zaidman A, Demeyer S. Analyzing large event traces with the help of coupling metrics. In Proc. the 5th International Workshop on OO Reengineering, Oslo, Norway, Jun. 14-18, 2004.Google Scholar
- Zaidman A, Bois B D, Demeyer S. How webmining and coupling metrics can improve early program comprehension. In Proc. the 14th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC 2006), Athens, Greece, Jun. 14-16, 2006, pp.74–78.Google Scholar
- Zaidman A. Scalability Solutions for Program Comprehension through Dynamic Analysis [PhD. Dissertation]. University of Antwerp, 2006.Google Scholar
- Gupta N, Rao P. Program execution based module cohesion measurement. In Proc. the 16th International Conference on Automated on Software Engineering (ASE 2001), San Diego, USA, Nov. 26-29, 2001, pp.144–153.Google Scholar
- Mitchell A, Power J F. Run-time cohesion metrics for the analysis of Java programs. Technical Report, Series No. NUIM-CS-TR-2003-08, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland, 2003.Google Scholar
- Mitchell A, Power J F, Run-time cohesion metrics: An empirical investigation. In Proc. the International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice, Las Vegas, USA, Jun. 21-24, 2004, pp.532–537.Google Scholar
- Munson J C, Khoshgoftaar T M. Measuring dynamic program complexity. IEEE Software, 1992, 9(6): 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Khoshgoftaar T M, Munson J C, Lanning D L. Dynamic system complexity. In Proc. Software Metrics Symposium, Baltimore, USA, May 21-22, 1993, pp.129–140.Google Scholar
- Munson J C, Khoshgoftaar T M. Software Metrics for Reliability Assessment. Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering, Michael Lyu (ed.), McGraw-Hill, 1996, pp.493–529.Google Scholar
- Arisholm E, Sjøberg D I K, Jørgensen M. Assessing the changeability of two object-oriented design alternatives — A controlled experiment. Empirical Software Engineering, 2001, 6(3): 231–277.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Selic B, Gullekson G, Ward P. Real-Time Object Oriented Modeling. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994.Google Scholar
- Booch G, Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I. The Unified Modeling Language Users Guide. Addison-Wesley, 1998.Google Scholar
- Kleinberg J M. Authoritative sources in a Hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 1999, 46(5): 604–632.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Bieman J M, Ott L M. Measuring functional cohesion. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1994, 20(8): 644–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Musa J D, Iannino A, Okumoto K. Software Reliability: Measurement, Prediction, Application. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1987.Google Scholar
- Ammar H H, Nikzadeh T, Dugan J. A methodology for risk assessment of functional specification of software systems using coherent petri nets. In Proc. the Fourth International Software Metrics Symposium (Metrics 1997), Albuquerque, USA, Nov. 5-7, 1997, pp.108–117.Google Scholar
- Mitchell A, Power J F. An approach to quantifying the runtime behaviour of Java GUI applications. In Proc. Winter International Symposium on Information and Communication Technologies, Cancun, Mexico, Jan. 5-8, 2004, pp.1–6.Google Scholar
- Yacoub S, Ammar H, Robinson T. A methodology for architectural-level risk assessment using dynamic metrics. In Proc. 11th Int. Symp. Software Reliability Eng, San Jose, Oct. 8-10, 2000, pp.210–221.Google Scholar
- RIAC document: Procedures for performing failure mode effects and criticality analysis. US MIL-STD-1629, Nov. 1974, US MIL-STDJ629A, Nov. 1980, US MIL STD 1629A/Notice 2, Nov. 1984.Google Scholar
- Cleland-Hunang J, Chang C K, Kim H, Balakrishnan A. A requirements-based dynamic metric in object-oriented systems. Proc. the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, Toronto, Canada, Aug. 27-31, 2001, pp.212–219.Google Scholar
- Cho E S, Kim C J, Kim S D, Rhew S Y. Static and dynamic metrics for effective object clustering. In Proc. Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, Taipei, China, Dec. 2-4, 1998, pp.78–85.Google Scholar
- Gunnalan R, Shereshevsky M, Ammar H H. Pseudo dynamic metrics. In Proc. the Third ACS/IEEE International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, Cairo, Egypt, Jan. 3-6, 2005, pp.117-iiv.Google Scholar
- Goseva-Popstojanova K. The impact of dynamic metrics on identification of the failure prone parts of the software. Lane Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA, June 2006.Google Scholar